Skip to main content

How choices change behavior

Finally, a relaxing mini-vacation! Just Mike and I in Aruba – a place that holds many nostalgic memories for us, including one very special marriage proposal 14 years ago (can it be that long ago???). With all the tranquil beauty of the sea, the beach, the perfect sunsets, one naturally reflects on … optimality of choices? Yes, when the “one” is an economist.


      Here is a dilemma for you. Upon arrival at our hotel, the front desk clerk makes us an offer to upgrade to the club level.  The freebies include: continental breakfast, light lunch, hors d’oeurves and desserts in the evening, unlimited wine and top-shelf liquor throughout the day, and a daily spa “activity” which no one could explain to us. There is also some less exciting stuff like daily laundry and pressing, concierge service, and free internet (which is already free for all guests J). The cost at face value: $300 per day for the two of us (a “discount” from the normal rate of $400 per day).  What would you do?  Well, let me add another piece of information that perhaps shouldn’t be relevant if you are totally rational, but might matter for everyone else: if we don’t do the club upgrade, our hotel stay is free. That’s right: we are staying here on points, and with our status we also already got a sweet upgrade to a suite with ocean views.
     Here is the rational approach.  Breakfast at the hotel would cost around $20 per person, lunch around $60 per person, and excluding dinner (which we planned to eat off the resort) drinks and dessert around $50 per person. That gives $260 total value, which doesn’t include the spa treatment whose value is uncertain, but probably more than $40 for two people. Sounds like the $300 price tag might actually be worth it. Also, once paid, the $300 becomes a “sunk cost” and should not affect subsequent decisions. For example, if we had already decided to do dinners at restaurants off the resorts, the fact that we paid for the club level should not change our mind to eat there.
     But Mike and I are rational enough to know that we aren’t actually rational. The choice to upgrade to the club level would change our in-the-moment behavior. Firstly, we typically don’t eat breakfast, but having committed to the club level would be “forced” to go. Now I love breakfast food, so I would definitely get extra enjoyment from the experience in the moment. But then would come the regret from overeating.  We would also probably end up overindulging in desserts and drinks because we would be similarly trying to extract maximum value from our club-level upgrade. This might actually decrease our enjoyment we would get from exploring different restaurants and local bars.
     The second consideration is that paying for the upgrade messes with the feeling that we are getting our vacation “for free.” This also is a thoroughly irrational way of thinking. Of course, without the club upgrade, we are still going to pay for all our meals.  But because we obviously have to eat whether or not we are on vacation, paying for those meals doesn’t feel so painful. On the other hand, paying for the club is dissociated from regular meals and feels like an “extra” expense. Furthermore, at the moment of the decision to upgrade to the club level, those payments feel remote – in a distant future – while paying $300 a night for the club is in the present.  In behavioral economics, we call this “present bias” which distorts intertemporal decision-making.
     So, we didn’t upgrade. And that decision set us on a completely different path to actions relative to the path we would have taken were we to pay for the club.  I am still happily caffeinated in the morning with the free in-room coffee, but we are sticking to the no-breakfast rule. Instead of sending a wrinkly dress to the overpriced pressing service, we hung it up in the shower and the humidity successfully took the wrinkles out.  We are also getting enjoyment from the idea that our vacation is still “free” (which is awesome, despite the fact that, of course, it is not because we’re still paying for pricey food and drinks).  And yesterday night we visited a favorite restaurant of ours from the trip when we got engaged, Papiamento, without any regret that we were forgoing free food at the club lounge!
Engagement dinner on the beach, June 2003
Dinner at Papiamento, September 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Facing the challenges of everyday life, Part 2

Fall of 2017: my closet is out of control.  Bursting at the seams with hardly ever-worn party dresses, jackets, and jumpsuits, it still manages to be completely devoid of options.  How is this possible, I muse, digging through the racks, laden with hangers, each carrying two or more items. Among the multitude of impulse buys and total duds, I locate that 15-year-old black jacket, two sizes too big and 20 dry cleans past its prime.  I wear it with a belt, and it looks ok.      Fast-forward one year: I no longer fall for impulse buys, and I almost never dry clean anything! Thank you, unlimited membership at Rent the Runway.   In a nutshell, I rent clothes, keep the four items I pick as long as I want to, and then return (no dry-cleaning required!).  As soon as the returns arrive back at the distribution center, I can pick my next items (conveniently "hearted" in the app).  First, this is a perfect mental replacement for shopping (hello, commitment device!).  I no longer go for …

Why I chose left

A few weeks ago, on March 1, 2019, I wrote a seemingly innocuous post on Facebook seeking my network’s opinions regarding my most recent professional photos.Specifically, I wrote: “Time to pick my new work profile pic! What looks more “professorial” - left or right?”The two photos are reproduced below.     Little did I know that this post would generate the greatest number of non-birthday comments ever (87!). On Instagram, the same post got 25 comments. Without even realizing it, I was conducting a survey experiment.The photo on the left displayed only a hint of a smile, chin up, and head slightly tilted to the right. The one on the right had me smiling a toothy smile, chin down, and head tilted left.Otherwise, the pictures were identical, down to the arm fold, slightly unruly hair, and outfit.(The only give-away that I didn’t originally plan this as an experiment was the fact that the two pictures were cropped differently, with the one on the left more zoomed in, so that less of m…

Redefining success

I can hardly believe it: last week marked the 10-year anniversary of my becoming a faculty member at Wellesley College.Over the last decade, I’ve coached countless students through health crises, anxiety over recruiting for jobs, striking the right school-life balance, and struggling over seemingly impossible problem set questions.But no concern looms larger for Wellesley college students than their angst over grades.      Grade anxiety isn’t just a Wellesley thing, of course. Yet the extreme extent to which grades define student experience at Wellesley has always bothered me, and never more so than now. Only at Wellesley would a student show up in her professor’s office after an exam not to argue about her grade, but rather to apologize for disappointing the professor. Oftentimes that “bad” grade is a B+!  More importantly, it seems like this self-defined “bad” grade is viewed as more than just academic weakness. Students see it as a failure in life in general – a profoundly disturbin…